Boston Qualifying times...motivational or discouraging??
Boston Qualifying times...motivational or discouraging??
For me, it would be motivational. I am 44 and I need to run 3:20 marathon to have a BQ. My PB for the Full marathon was 3:39 in 2008 Vancouver Marathon. I have a long way to go before I reach 3:20....if ever. Perhaps, more speed work, intervals, and more mileage. You just never know... I believe female runners have way easier time to qualify for Boston than for men!!
What's Up Next:
Rock N Roll Seattle Marathon June 27/09
Recent Race:
Mother's Day Spring Classic 5K 21:27
Diez Vista 50K 6:58
Dave Reed Spring Classic 5 K 21:01
2009 First Half 1:37:40
2009 Harry's Spring Run-Off 35:03.
Rock N Roll Seattle Marathon June 27/09
Recent Race:
Mother's Day Spring Classic 5K 21:27
Diez Vista 50K 6:58
Dave Reed Spring Classic 5 K 21:01
2009 First Half 1:37:40
2009 Harry's Spring Run-Off 35:03.
Your half-marathon time shows you're pretty close in speed-- just need more endurance training and more mileage, mostly. I seem to remember you did that Vancouver time on pretty low mileage.
Keep up the hard work and you'll get there.
If it were easier then it wouldn't be as big of a deal. Anyway, they might have to make the standards harder as it fills up earlier and earlier each year..
It's definitely easier for women (should be more like a 15-20 minute gap, or a sliding gap, instead of 30 minutes for all age groups), but still more men run it, and they want to keep the numbers more even.
It's definitely a real motivator for me-- I have 16 minutes to go.
Keep up the hard work and you'll get there.
If it were easier then it wouldn't be as big of a deal. Anyway, they might have to make the standards harder as it fills up earlier and earlier each year..
It's definitely easier for women (should be more like a 15-20 minute gap, or a sliding gap, instead of 30 minutes for all age groups), but still more men run it, and they want to keep the numbers more even.
It's definitely a real motivator for me-- I have 16 minutes to go.
- ultraslacker
- Site Admin
- Posts: 46890
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:33 pm
- Location: paradise
- Contact:
Yes. It's a dream for me! If I can maintain my speed until I'm 65, I should be good to go!
http://connect.garmin.com/profile/trixiee14
Why fit in when you were born to stand out?
~ Dr. Suess~
Life is short. Drink the good wine first!
Why fit in when you were born to stand out?
~ Dr. Suess~
Life is short. Drink the good wine first!
- QuickChick
- Lynn Williams
- Posts: 13274
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:52 pm
- Location: Whitby ON
Absolutely motivational!
"Don’t let negativity rent space in your brain for free. That is how you become a badass…by excavating her from inside you. You don’t have to become someone else. You need to identify the effing awesome parts of you that are your tools to work with, and maximize those." -Lauren Fleshman
Though, for some, it makes getting older, to the next 5 year increment, a bit easier to digest, as you get 5 to 10 minutes closer to qualify :eh:
If I can keep my currrent health and fitness, I should be able to qualify in 2011 when I am 48 for 2013 when I turn 50 ....
If I can keep my currrent health and fitness, I should be able to qualify in 2011 when I am 48 for 2013 when I turn 50 ....
Race Results: http://itsmyrun.com/index.php?display=p ... unner=HCiD
Re: Boston Qualifying times...motivational or discouraging??
Keep hammerin'! You'll get there!runnerman wrote:For me, it would be motivational. I am 44 and I need to run 3:20 marathon to have a BQ. My PB for the Full marathon was 3:39 in 2008 Vancouver Marathon. I have a long way to go before I reach 3:20....if ever. Perhaps, more speed work, intervals, and more mileage. You just never know... I believe female runners have way easier time to qualify for Boston than for men!!
"...twenty miles of hope, six miles of truth..."
21 marathons since 2001......up next, CND Army half-marathon in Sept. and Toronto Waterfront marathon in Oct.
21 marathons since 2001......up next, CND Army half-marathon in Sept. and Toronto Waterfront marathon in Oct.
- Strider
- Jerome Drayton
- Posts: 5387
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:40 am
- Location: Training to find my next edge
- Contact:
Re: Boston Qualifying times...motivational or discouraging??
runnerman wrote:For me, it would be motivational. I am 44 and I need to run 3:20 marathon to have a BQ. My
Note: You are soon to be 45, and therefore need a 3:30:59. Not sure when your Birthday is, but if you are 44 now, then this time next year you'll be 45 and that is before the 2010 Boston, so you are good with a 3:30:59.
and a work of warning - do not open the "women have it easier" can of worms. It may seem that way, but the times are set for a reason and I trust the BAA to have set the right standards.
Motivational for sure. If I think back to my last Marathon in Disney, I could have coasted into the finish, but instead I pushed and pushed just to break that BQ barrier, had it not been there I might have run a 3:32, but nope, had to get that 3:30.
It is a goal or carrot stick that is always out there.
Help Fight Children's Cancer with Sears Canada and GoodGuysTri - 26 Team Mates, All Running 100km, 1 Goal.
If you have the time please read my participation page and consider a donation.
If you have the time please read my participation page and consider a donation.
Re: Boston Qualifying times...motivational or discouraging??
Strider wrote:It is a goal or carrot stick that is always out there.
I don't find carrot sticks to be motivational in the least. I eat them every day for lunch!
Personally, I find the qualifying times to be a bit arbitrary. And I'm still at least 45 minutes away from mine (though it's been almost five years since I've run a marathon and I'm faster now than I was back then, so realistically, I'm probably 20-30 minutes away (the proof will be in the pudding when I run Vegas in December).
"Maybe I will be my own inspiration." - UltraMonk (Laura)
"Everywhere is walking distance if you have enough time." - Steven Wright
"Everywhere is walking distance if you have enough time." - Steven Wright
Motivational for me for sure. When I was really far from the times, I just didn't care about Boston, so it wasn't discouraging at all. Now that I'm (hopefully) one good training cycle away from the time I need, it's a fun thing to shoot for.
I'm not even all that interested in the race. I'd just like to be in the qualifiers' club.
I'm not even all that interested in the race. I'd just like to be in the qualifiers' club.
- scrumhalfgirl
- Lynn Williams
- Posts: 19368
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:50 am
- Location: Ottawa
- Doonst
- Abby Hoffman
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:17 pm
- Location: the corner of Sixth and Where Do I Go?
- Contact:
dgrant wrote:I'm not even all that interested in the race. I'd just like to be in the qualifiers' club.
That's what they all say. Until it happens.
runnerman if you are regularly running 1:37 halfs, I think that a 3:30 full is just a pile of long runs away (its way easier for 45 year olds). Totally doable if you want it. Just tough enough to make it interesting.
next up:
This broken wing will fly again
One fine day
This blackbird's mute gonna sing again
One fine day
So all you sinners come out
And all you drunkards crawl out
Come into the light of one fine day
This broken wing will fly again
One fine day
This blackbird's mute gonna sing again
One fine day
So all you sinners come out
And all you drunkards crawl out
Come into the light of one fine day
- canalrunner
- Bill Crothers
- Posts: 1422
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: Ottawa
I wouldn't want to join any club that would have me as a member--Groucho Marx
Definitely a motivator--if not a dream. When I first ran 30 years ago, the fastest qualifying time was 2:50 and I was running 3:07. I quit for 20 years. Returning to running I found that the BQ times had changed, and with age group qualification, I could qualify. It was a thrill to qualify....and when I turned on to Bolyston for the final stretch and saw the finish line...it was like what Catholics must feel when they go to church at the Vatican. I still get goose bumps.
The 10 minute bump of the BQ for 45 year old males to 3:30 is definitely a Boston qualifying 'sweet spot'. Amazing what a difference 10 minutes makes.
Definitely a motivator--if not a dream. When I first ran 30 years ago, the fastest qualifying time was 2:50 and I was running 3:07. I quit for 20 years. Returning to running I found that the BQ times had changed, and with age group qualification, I could qualify. It was a thrill to qualify....and when I turned on to Bolyston for the final stretch and saw the finish line...it was like what Catholics must feel when they go to church at the Vatican. I still get goose bumps.
The 10 minute bump of the BQ for 45 year old males to 3:30 is definitely a Boston qualifying 'sweet spot'. Amazing what a difference 10 minutes makes.
Last edited by canalrunner on Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
The longest journey begins with a single step.
2016 Races
May: Ottawa Marathon
2016 Races
May: Ottawa Marathon
- Robbie-T
- Jerome Drayton
- Posts: 6340
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:44 am
- Location: Awesome World
- Contact:
dgrant wrote:Motivational for me for sure. When I was really far from the times, I just didn't care about Boston, so it wasn't discouraging at all. Now that I'm (hopefully) one good training cycle away from the time I need, it's a fun thing to shoot for.
I'm not even all that interested in the race. I'd just like to be in the qualifiers' club.
This is exactly the same way I thought. Yes it is very motivational once it becomes a realistic goal that you can envision.
Mississauga Marathon - 2:52
Around the Bay - 1:58
Click>> Race History
ItsMyRun.com
"If I'm running, it will be a good run" - Robbie-T
"I just hope that people look at it and say, 'Hey if this yahoo can do it, then I can do it too.' That'd be cool if people thought that. It's just a matter of putting the miles in and working. It's not so much how much talent you have. I hope." - Brian Sell.
"To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the Gift." - Pre
Around the Bay - 1:58
Click>> Race History
ItsMyRun.com
"If I'm running, it will be a good run" - Robbie-T
"I just hope that people look at it and say, 'Hey if this yahoo can do it, then I can do it too.' That'd be cool if people thought that. It's just a matter of putting the miles in and working. It's not so much how much talent you have. I hope." - Brian Sell.
"To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the Gift." - Pre
HCmD wrote:Though, for some, it makes getting older, to the next 5 year increment, a bit easier to digest
That is exactly right I mean...I only need a 4:15 this year to qualify for Boston 2010...being a woman who will turn 55 this year...
that said, a 4:15 would be very close to a PB for me and I have not run a PB for a very long time...
I read somewhere that the age average for the Boston marathon is above 40 years old. Maybe that is because qualifying times are "easier" for the older age groups (or maybe also because running Boston is an expensive project that may deter younger/poorer runners from entering?)
Last edited by LadyV on Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Don't have time for a run? Go for a run' (Marc Remy - RW)
www.itsmyrun.com
www.itsmyrun.com
-
- Johnny Miles
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:44 pm
- Location: Toronto
For me it's I go between being motivated by and discouraged by it. It motivates me that it could be possible. Last night, I was running a tempo pace that would be equal to the pace i'd have to run in order to qualify. It gives me hope that I am getting there and reminds me how much I've improved. But it discourages me because it in no way is a comfortable pace. I think about it as a longer term goal because my improvements are more incremental and if i started obsessing over it and really pushing for it i would probably, 1. get injured and 2. suck all the fun out of running.
BTW: I thought I saw in Runner's World a few months ago a stat that about 17% of female marathon finishers were under 4 hours. I can't remember which year they said either. Can anyone verify? It's probably an American stat. So, for lots of women qualifying is a pretty tough thing even if it is "easier" than for men.
BTW: I thought I saw in Runner's World a few months ago a stat that about 17% of female marathon finishers were under 4 hours. I can't remember which year they said either. Can anyone verify? It's probably an American stat. So, for lots of women qualifying is a pretty tough thing even if it is "easier" than for men.
Plan For 2010:
ATB 30K:
Mercedes-Benz 10k
Vicoria's Du
Guelph Lake Sprint Tri
Toronto Island Sprint Tri
An Oly or HIM - TBD- Sept
ATB 30K:
Mercedes-Benz 10k
Vicoria's Du
Guelph Lake Sprint Tri
Toronto Island Sprint Tri
An Oly or HIM - TBD- Sept
bruyère wrote:I change age groups this year, so I'm kind of meh about it if I don't qualify this year... for some reason, don't like the idea of qualifying 'cuz I got older.
But the age group qualifying times are so arbitrary - what difference does it make if you qualify because you got older? Clearly, the assumption they are making by having age-group qualifying times is that people slow down as they get older. So, if you are able to qualify with a slower time (because you are now into a new age group), then that says that you haven't slowed down as much as they expected you would. That's an achievement! And, I'm actually getting faster as I age and improve my fitness, so that's something that motivates me.
The importance/significance is entirely personal and what we make of it. However, we're measuring ourselves against an external standard, so we have to put things in perspective.
"Maybe I will be my own inspiration." - UltraMonk (Laura)
"Everywhere is walking distance if you have enough time." - Steven Wright
"Everywhere is walking distance if you have enough time." - Steven Wright
La wrote:bruyère wrote:I change age groups this year, so I'm kind of meh about it if I don't qualify this year... for some reason, don't like the idea of qualifying 'cuz I got older.
But the age group qualifying times are so arbitrary - what difference does it make if you qualify because you got older? Clearly, the assumption they are making by having age-group qualifying times is that people slow down as they get older. So, if you are able to qualify with a slower time (because you are now into a new age group), then that says that you haven't slowed down as much as they expected you would. That's an achievement! And, I'm actually getting faster as I age and improve my fitness, so that's something that motivates me.
The importance/significance is entirely personal and what we make of it. However, we're measuring ourselves against an external standard, so we have to put things in perspective.
That's why I said "kind of meh" and "for some reason"... it's just a vague notion of how I feel. Won't necessarily actually affect anything.
juniperjen wrote:BTW: I thought I saw in Runner's World a few months ago a stat that about 17% of female marathon finishers were under 4 hours. I can't remember which year they said either. Can anyone verify? It's probably an American stat. So, for lots of women qualifying is a pretty tough thing even if it is "easier" than for men.
A couple years ago we had this discussion, and I looked at several age groups at 4 or 5 major marathons. It was a pretty standard 12-15% of runners in either gender in each age group who ran a qualifying time.
Which doesn't really prove or disprove anything in terms of which is "easier" physiologically, but I agree with you that it's not like a tiny slice of men get in and the floodgates are wide open for women.
Return to “General Running Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests