Chip & Gun Time

Everything about the training process, including programs, experiences, etc.

User avatar
jacob42.2
Bill Crothers
Posts: 1092
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 7:39 pm
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Contact:

Chip & Gun Time

Postby jacob42.2 » Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:52 am

In some events you'll recieve a small microchip for you shoe. This serves as a timing device, and can give you splits along the course. It also allows you to see your CHIP time and GUN time.

CHIP-The time that you have actually crossed the start line. This time, if you started farther back from the line, will be faster than your gun time.

GUN- The time the actual race started, and the official time, as to not turn every race into a Time Trial (TT)

The chip time is also the time you can use for a BQ (Boston Marathon Qualifier) and a PB/PR (Personal Best/Personal Record)
PB's: 5k: 16:40 10K: 34:59 21.1: 1:17:16 Marathon: 02:50:47
RUNNING MANIA #2

User avatar
dgrant
Lynn Williams
Posts: 13854
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:01 am
Location: Down by the river

Postby dgrant » Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:10 am

At both of the 10km races I've done this month there have been timing chips, but no 'chip time'. There were no timing mats at the start line to record each runner's start, only mats at the finish to record each person's finish. So all that was measured was the elapsed time from the sound of the start gun to the time you crossed the line (gun time).

The chip was only there to record runners' individual finishes, instead of the old-fashioned way of having dozens of volunteers scribbling down bib numbers as racers finished.

However, this is pretty rare, and both these races had fewer than 200 runners.

User avatar
Monk
Bruce Kidd
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:41 am

Postby Monk » Thu Jul 28, 2005 1:20 am

Is chip timing more prolific than gun timing? I have run a number of local races and it seems to be 50/50...

User avatar
dgrant
Lynn Williams
Posts: 13854
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:01 am
Location: Down by the river

Postby dgrant » Thu Jul 28, 2005 9:58 am

Templar wrote:Is chip timing more prolific than gun timing? I have run a number of local races and it seems to be 50/50...


I think it depends on the size and distance of the race. Small, short races can do without chips, but longer races use chips partly to record split times, as well as to record finish times.

User avatar
Monk
Bruce Kidd
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:41 am

Postby Monk » Thu Jul 28, 2005 9:02 pm

I think it depends on the size and distance of the race. Small, short races can do without chips, but longer races use chips partly to record split times, as well as to record finish times.


Right. And I was therefore surprised at the RedDeer marathon that it was a field of over a thousand and it was gun timed.
The time did turn out fairly accurate though. I started my 'watch' when I crossed the start and stopped when I crossed the finish, and they were only about 15 seconds faster (I started at the back of the pack).

User avatar
dgrant
Lynn Williams
Posts: 13854
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 12:01 am
Location: Down by the river

Postby dgrant » Thu Jul 28, 2005 11:08 pm

Geez, for a full marathon it would be fair to expect some split times. Some races give you 4 or 5 splits.

User avatar
Monk
Bruce Kidd
Posts: 681
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 12:41 am

Postby Monk » Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:25 pm

(not that it means much anymore, but...)

And this race is certified as a BQ, as well... :roll:


Return to “Training ”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests