GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Clothing, accessories, equipment, etc.
User avatar
MrBond
Bill Crothers
Posts: 2492
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:38 am
Location: Toronto (East York)

GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby MrBond » Wed Nov 04, 2015 6:57 am

"You're in over your head Donny..."

User avatar
turd ferguson
Ben Johnson
Posts: 28512
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:11 am
Location: It's a funny name
Contact:

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby turd ferguson » Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:38 pm

The Ranacher team’s results do not mean that measuring the lengths of complex courses by GPS is futile. They point out that moment-by-moment GPS velocity measurement is not subject to the same sources of error, so that calculating distance traveled by integrating velocity should yield reasonably accurate results.


This point is flashing in and out of my understanding. I think its saying that velocity is not subject to interpolation error and so that calculating distance by integrating velocity (which doesn't require distance to be interpolated) is more accurate. But wouldn't the integral of velocity be subject to a different set of errors that potentially make it less accurate?

The best analog I have is to a car odometer. The car doesn't know where you are, it mechanically integrates speed, but if there's an error in the input (like the time I put monster truck tires on my jeep) the odometer is going to be wrong.
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." - Douglas Adams

User avatar
Jwolf
Kevin Sullivan
Posts: 37476
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby Jwolf » Wed Nov 04, 2015 5:04 pm

Yeah, I don't get that either.

I also don't really see how it matters that much to runners. It's not that important that we understand perfectly the details of WHY the GPS measures long. It's a combination of factors, and different ones will be more important in some or other situations. The reason most often given- that runners don't run the straightest line measured-- is still a factor, but there are other factors inherent to the nature of GPS measurement as well. This isn't really news. People who use GPS regularly know that the distance it reads will often be long by about 1-2%. That doesn't make it any less of a useful tool as long as you expect this.

ETA: The author comments that maybe runners will be happier to know that the mis-measurement of their marathon is not their fault but the inherent fault of GPS. Maybe, maybe not. It's really only important to know that it's the watch and not the RD's measurement of the course. :)
Support me in my fundraising for the Boston Marathon, Boston Public Library team:
https://www.crowdrise.com/o/en/campaign ... iferwolf11

Commodore665
Percy Williams
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:34 pm

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby Commodore665 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:23 pm

I've found the GPS is only just out , if I measure the distance in my cars GPS its out by only a k or less , but I think being a slave to them and you tend to enjoy the run less


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
ultraslacker
Site Admin
Posts: 46890
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 5:33 pm
Location: paradise
Contact:

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby ultraslacker » Sat Nov 14, 2015 6:52 pm

I don't need mine to be perfect (my old one was usually short, not sure about my new one). I use it as a basis for training, but in a race scenario it's just a loose guide and you're going by the race markers and clocks.

Also, I enjoy my runs more with gps than without. :)
"You're an ultrarunner, normal rules don't apply to you." (Doonst)


First say to yourself what you would be; and then do what you have to do. ~Epictetus

User avatar
marymac442
Jerome Drayton
Posts: 4660
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:13 am
Location: Burnaby, BC

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby marymac442 » Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:02 pm

If I run without a gps recording and strava, did it really happen ;)

I don't look at my watch much during a run but I like having the record of accumulated km's.
Bonsor Breakfast Club
"It's All About the Food

2019 plans - Sun Run Clinic (as usual), make it past tax season with sanity intact, start training, Chicago Marathon !!!

User avatar
Jwolf
Kevin Sullivan
Posts: 37476
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby Jwolf » Sun Nov 15, 2015 12:22 am

I think the bottom line is that if you expect the GPS distance to be better than about 1-2% error, then you are "doing it wrong". It doesn't make me feel any better that it's not my lack of running tangents that causes the error. Just expect it to be a bit long - and adjust expectations.

I do feel bad for race directors that get bombarded with emails from runners telling them that the race measured long on their GPS watches.
Support me in my fundraising for the Boston Marathon, Boston Public Library team:
https://www.crowdrise.com/o/en/campaign ... iferwolf11

User avatar
La
Kevin Sullivan
Posts: 47990
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:11 pm
Location: Lesleyville!

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby La » Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:44 am

One look at the map from my run yesterday will explain why GPS watches measure long. My run looks like something a drunk person would have done! :lol:

https://www.strava.com/activities/433471660

In this case, it was interference from tall buildings downtown. And considering many races we do are run in cities, we're going to get some wacky readings.

I'm like Mary: I don't really look at my watch much during my run (just to see how far/long I've gone, and is it time to turn around yet :lol: ), but I like to have the data logged for comparison purposes.

In a race, I'm far more likely to use the KM markers and hit manual lap splits on my watch (along with a pace band) to keep me on pace. That's why I get very cranky if the KM markers are off.
"Maybe I will be my own inspiration." - UltraMonk (Laura)
"Everywhere is walking distance if you have enough time." - Steven Wright

Commodore665
Percy Williams
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:34 pm

GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby Commodore665 » Sun Nov 29, 2015 2:28 am

According to the app I use , this mornings 13.50 Kilometre run took 38 minutes @ 20 kilometres per hour , on my watch it was closer to 1 hour 10 minute


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
Jwolf
Kevin Sullivan
Posts: 37476
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby Jwolf » Sun Nov 29, 2015 3:14 am

Commodore665 wrote:According to the app I use , this mornings 13.50 Kilometre run took 38 minutes @ 20 kilometres per hour , on my watch it was closer to 1 hour 10 minutes.

That's not normal behaviour for a GPS watch- check your settings. The time should be the elapsed time and shouldn't be shorter.
Support me in my fundraising for the Boston Marathon, Boston Public Library team:
https://www.crowdrise.com/o/en/campaign ... iferwolf11

Commodore665
Percy Williams
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:34 pm

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby Commodore665 » Wed Dec 02, 2015 1:33 pm

Jwolf wrote:
Commodore665 wrote:According to the app I use , this mornings 13.50 Kilometre run took 38 minutes @ 20 kilometres per hour , on my watch it was closer to 1 hour 10 minutes.

That's not normal behaviour for a GPS watch- check your settings. The time should be the elapsed time and shouldn't be shorter.


No , it's more" map my run " being a useless app


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User avatar
Jwolf
Kevin Sullivan
Posts: 37476
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby Jwolf » Wed Dec 02, 2015 9:53 pm

Commodore665 wrote:
Jwolf wrote:
Commodore665 wrote:According to the app I use , this mornings 13.50 Kilometre run took 38 minutes @ 20 kilometres per hour , on my watch it was closer to 1 hour 10 minutes.

That's not normal behaviour for a GPS watch- check your settings. The time should be the elapsed time and shouldn't be shorter.


No , it's more" map my run " being a useless app


Actually, the app is pretty useful and I know quite a few people who use it. It may be off a bit in distance, but at the very least it should have the total time of your workout correct. Make sure that "autopause" is off in the settings.
Support me in my fundraising for the Boston Marathon, Boston Public Library team:
https://www.crowdrise.com/o/en/campaign ... iferwolf11

User avatar
turd ferguson
Ben Johnson
Posts: 28512
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:11 am
Location: It's a funny name
Contact:

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby turd ferguson » Thu Dec 03, 2015 11:37 am

Jwolf wrote:
Commodore665 wrote:
Jwolf wrote:
Commodore665 wrote:According to the app I use , this mornings 13.50 Kilometre run took 38 minutes @ 20 kilometres per hour , on my watch it was closer to 1 hour 10 minutes.

That's not normal behaviour for a GPS watch- check your settings. The time should be the elapsed time and shouldn't be shorter.


No , it's more" map my run " being a useless app


Actually, the app is pretty useful and I know quite a few people who use it. It may be off a bit in distance, but at the very least it should have the total time of your workout correct. Make sure that "autopause" is off in the settings.


That is kind of the definition of useless, unless all you wanted was a stopwatch.
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." - Douglas Adams

User avatar
Jwolf
Kevin Sullivan
Posts: 37476
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 10:02 pm
Location: Vancouver

GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby Jwolf » Thu Dec 03, 2015 11:43 am

turd ferguson wrote:
Jwolf wrote:
Commodore665 wrote:
Jwolf wrote:
Commodore665 wrote:According to the app I use , this mornings 13.50 Kilometre run took 38 minutes @ 20 kilometres per hour , on my watch it was closer to 1 hour 10 minutes.

That's not normal behaviour for a GPS watch- check your settings. The time should be the elapsed time and shouldn't be shorter.


No , it's more" map my run " being a useless app


Actually, the app is pretty useful and I know quite a few people who use it. It may be off a bit in distance, but at the very least it should have the total time of your workout correct. Make sure that "autopause" is off in the settings.


That is kind of the definition of useless, unless all you wanted was a stopwatch.


My point is it's not useless in general but he's got the settings messed up.

If the app is just off slightly in distance (the app may be out a little more than the 1-2% of the GPS watch) it will still be very useful for tracking your distance. And many people do that. In the big picture it's not going to make a huge difference if you log 13.1 or 13.5K as long as you have consistency.

He's calling the app useless because his total time was off - that's an easy fix.
Support me in my fundraising for the Boston Marathon, Boston Public Library team:
https://www.crowdrise.com/o/en/campaign ... iferwolf11

Commodore665
Percy Williams
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 10:34 pm

Re: GPS Overestimates Distance Traveled

Postby Commodore665 » Fri Oct 28, 2016 4:26 pm

Jwolf wrote:
turd ferguson wrote:
Jwolf wrote:
Commodore665 wrote:
Jwolf wrote:
Commodore665 wrote:According to the app I use , this mornings 13.50 Kilometre run took 38 minutes @ 20 kilometres per hour , on my watch it was closer to 1 hour 10 minutes.

That's not normal behaviour for a GPS watch- check your settings. The time should be the elapsed time and shouldn't be shorter.


No , it's more" map my run " being a useless app


Actually, the app is pretty useful and I know quite a few people who use it. It may be off a bit in distance, but at the very least it should have the total time of your workout correct. Make sure that "autopause" is off in the settings.


That is kind of the definition of useless, unless all you wanted was a stopwatch.


My point is it's not useless in general but he's got the settings messed up.

If the app is just off slightly in distance (the app may be out a little more than the 1-2% of the GPS watch) it will still be very useful for tracking your distance. And many people do that. In the big picture it's not going to make a huge difference if you log 13.1 or 13.5K as long as you have consistency.

He's calling the app useless because his total time was off - that's an easy fix.


No not all , you would enjoy running more if you ditched it like I did


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Return to “Gearing Up”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests